In A Nutshell
If you aren’t in tune with California’s ongoing drought you are either (a) steadfastly oblivious to the news or (b) you have zero regard for the welfare of California.
I fall into both (a) and (b) so imagine my
surprise when, after clicking on a picture of a woman in a bikini (because the
caption said I might get rich if I did) I was presented with the following
headline:
My shock, as you can well imagine, reverberated
on several levels of perception.
My first thought as a writer was “Shouldn’t
every word in a headline be capitalized?”
My next thought was something like “God
this instant coffee tastes like crap.”
Then after one final fleeting thought of my
days as a rich man in a bikini I decided that Starbucks must be one fine
organization. ‘Ethos’ water? Sounds like they’ve really got their moral
elements all in a row, contributing to the health of all their
non-coffee-drinking customers by way of a mass manufacturing of plastic bottles.
The Ethos of the Bottled
Water Biz (all main words capitalized)
Image: NYTimes / Little Man on Wrist: No Idea |
I guess the name Ethos is supposed to point
to the fact that a cool nickel from the sale of each $2 bottle of CALIFORNIA water
is donated “to
a fund that supports water and sanitation programs in coffee-growing countries
such as Tanzania, Indonesia and Colombia.”
In
other words, they take 5 cents from the sale of each bottle of CALIFORNIA water
and use that to filter the water they take from people living in Tanzania, Indonesia
and Colombia for use in their coffee-growing endeavors. But wait, Matt
Damon says they also sponsor clean water systems and hygiene education for
people, mainly children, in these same areas and who am I to argue with Jason
Bourne? I mean, the guy is fricking amazing.
Recently, however, Starbucks
seems to have taken a good hard look in their froth-covered mirror and decided
they didn’t want to risk losing their froth-covered mirrors.
Starbucks
wants to "support the people of the state of California as they face this
unprecedented drought," lies John Kelly, Starbucks'
senior vice president of Global Responsibility and Public Policy.
Johnny
Boy, some people do watch the news, remember? And for the rest of us there’s Google.
Think no one read this
article? (We use ‘private spring source that
is not used for municipal water for any communities,’
contends
Starbuckey.)
Or
this
one? (‘You capture and pull it out
before it ever makes it downstream’ says Department
of Water Resources’ Mary “Bullshit Walks” Scruggs.)
Or this
one? (“Due
to a challenging economy and changes in Ethos Water distribution, Starbucks
must extend the timeline to reach our $10 million contribution goal (to the
water projects we are totally committed to) beyond 2010,” Starbucks’ Customer Care commented, not adding that Howard
Schultz, CEO of Starbuck’s, would
make $22 million in 2010.)
"Yeah yeah, we'll get them their precious water...Now tell me again how my $22 million breaks down?" |
But
let’s congratulate Seattle Brew and their cadre of marketing gurus for their to-date contributions of over $12 million
to people who don’t make in a year what Americans will pay for a plastic cup of
ice drizzled with milk and a little coffee topped with a film of whipped cream
and a bit of caramel sauce in a cool grid-like pattern. Good work folks. Glad
we could help.
And
I’m glad a few people out there decided to bring Starbuck’s antics to light, for the
edification of anyone who pays attention to the news and/or cares about
California. (I now fall into both categories…once in a while.)
Because
if none of this had made the news you can bet Johnny Boy up there would have never
uttered those words.
Another tidbit I picked up from skimming the news tonight after my wife
went to bed early yet again:
There
are 108 bottled water companies operating in California which, by
its own admission has close to 500 breweries. I appplaud California for complaining to the proper beverage industry.
Wikipedia
tells us the state’s breweries employ over 7,000 people. I have an aversion to
quoting Wiki-people but that number lends great segue as the number of people also
employed by Nestle, who has made their own waves in the news recently.
In the late 1800s a couple of enterprising businessmen decided to make a lake in the San Bernadino Mountains east of Los Angeles. The forest was cleared, dams were built, and the creeks, streams, rainfall and snowmelt from the surrounding mountains began to fill up Little Bear Valley, creating Lake Arrowhead.
The lake is best known today as a vacation destination, but the water in it remains privately owned, a legacy of the Arrowhead Reservoir Company's original plan for the 48,000 acre-feet of water; to sell it to towns in the arid valleys below.
One of a paltry few billion / JackFischerGallery.com |
Dam
up the water so it doesn’t flow into the valley, then sell that water to the
people in the valley.
But Nestle says it’s all kosher.
Go
ahead. Decide for yourself. Just don’t do it over a dish of almonds.
No comments:
Post a Comment